<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Discuss Powder - Data Reduction]]></title>
		<link>https://powder.ornl.gov/forum/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Discuss Powder - https://powder.ornl.gov/forum]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Data reduction speed]]></title>
			<link>https://powder.ornl.gov/forum/showthread.php?tid=23</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2023 20:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://powder.ornl.gov/forum/member.php?action=profile&uid=0">y8z</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://powder.ornl.gov/forum/showthread.php?tid=23</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Here in the following link, I put the test result of the <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">running time</span></span> for current data reduction routine used for powder diffraction data reduction,<br />
<br />
<a href="https://powder.ornl.gov/run_time.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://powder.ornl.gov/run_time.html</a><br />
<br />
It will be very nice if you can take a look at your instrument and give feedback in current thread.<br />
<br />
You can just log in with your UCAMS to post.<br />
<br />
To vote, put down your instrument name followed by your vote, like this ('+1' means it looks good, '-1' means you are expected shorter running time and so you need to give your expected running time),<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">N.B.</span> I know that the actual running time really depends on the samples and data involved in the reduction. In the link above, I put down all the files I have been using for getting the running time result, so we can use them as the reference for the discussion and voting.<br />
<br />
HB2A: +1<br />
HB2A: -1, [My expected running time]<br />
<br />
HB2C: +1<br />
HB2C: -1, [My expected running time]<br />
<br />
NOMAD: +1<br />
NOMAD: -1, [My expected running time]<br />
<br />
POWGEN: +1<br />
POWGEN: -1, [My expected running time]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here in the following link, I put the test result of the <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">running time</span></span> for current data reduction routine used for powder diffraction data reduction,<br />
<br />
<a href="https://powder.ornl.gov/run_time.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://powder.ornl.gov/run_time.html</a><br />
<br />
It will be very nice if you can take a look at your instrument and give feedback in current thread.<br />
<br />
You can just log in with your UCAMS to post.<br />
<br />
To vote, put down your instrument name followed by your vote, like this ('+1' means it looks good, '-1' means you are expected shorter running time and so you need to give your expected running time),<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">N.B.</span> I know that the actual running time really depends on the samples and data involved in the reduction. In the link above, I put down all the files I have been using for getting the running time result, so we can use them as the reference for the discussion and voting.<br />
<br />
HB2A: +1<br />
HB2A: -1, [My expected running time]<br />
<br />
HB2C: +1<br />
HB2C: -1, [My expected running time]<br />
<br />
NOMAD: +1<br />
NOMAD: -1, [My expected running time]<br />
<br />
POWGEN: +1<br />
POWGEN: -1, [My expected running time]]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>